Preventing Ex-Criminals To Do Criminal Activities After Imprisonment - 275 Words

Preventing Ex-Criminals To Do Criminal Activities After Imprisonment (Coursework Sample) Content: Student’s name: Professor’s name: Course: Date: Crime After Imprisonment Introduction A good number of offenders who serve in prison commit crime after release. Several reasons can be attributed to this. In prison criminals meet other hardcore criminals who make them more hardened to criminal activities. In addition, lack of rehabilitation, job opportunities, stigmatization, psychological illness, inferiority complex, stress and torture caused by prison warders makes them angry. After release, they would want to fester the anger to other people in the society. (Murray and Joseph 442-492.). It is quite evident that the many criminals repeat the same after imprisonment and this is very unsafe to the community. Something must be done to avert such behaviors. Firstly, when the criminals are incarcerated, they relate with the hardcore criminals and emulate them. Secondly, in many jails there are criminals who engage in illegal activities which with time influence the new convicts into the same. Thirdly, the community does not freely interact with ex-convicts once after imprisonment. Also, these criminals do not secure employment easily. This makes it hard for them to survive in the society since they have no source of income and the society treats them as social misfits (Monahan, Brodsky, and Shan 23-26). This problem can only be solved if the government implements strict measures against those who engage in criminal activities while undergoing their imprisonment. There should be spiritual enrichment programs organized in jail, to build the criminal minds morally. Criminals who have talents should be nurtured. For example, those who are good in sports, arts, studies etc. should be trained to perfection so as to sustain themselves when released. Lastly, the society should be equipped with knowledge on how to handle ex-convicts in a positive way as they go back home. They should be given opportunities depending on what they have learnt on their talent and behavior. Proper counseling and rehabilitation should be adequately provided to the criminals to enable them to fit in the society after imprisonment. Provision of vocational tra...

The Affect Of Power In The Play The Crucible - Free Essay Example

Power doesnt corrupt people, people corrupt power (William Gaddis). Puritanism was a powerful religious, social, and political order in New England colonial life. In a Puritan society, humans wanted to reform the Christian church and believed that the devil had servants that worked for him on Earth. Arthur Millerrs play, The Crucible, explains the persecution of persons falsely accused of being witches in Salem, Massachusetts, in 1692. The play portrays power and how that power shifts among the characters. It shows which characters have power and how power can overtake people causing them to abuse it for material gain, self-preservation, or revenge. Two minor characters, Samuel Parris and Thomas Putnam, acquire power; one desperate to keep it and one hungers for more. Power and authority are the epitome of this Patriarchal Society where men control all: wives, children, servants, courts, and the church. Reverend Samuel Parris holds an important position of authority and places himself even higher than others in the community. He is a weak man, obsessed with power and control, and throughout the play is only concerned with his reputation and money. When challenged, especially by John Proctor, Parris resents this opposition and reminds others that Proctor does not attend church on a regular basis; therefore, his opinion doesnt matter about reforms to the church. Proctor, a well-respected man in the community, is quick to point out that he dislikes Parris sermons because [he] hardly even mention[s] God any more (Miller 27). Parris is supposed to be a man of the Lord and live a simple life, but his materialistic demands on the community continue throughout the play. Using his religious position, Parris assumes that his newly made contract will suppor t and maintain firewood to last him a lifetime. Much to his dismay, Parris is met with constant opposition and wonders why he cannot offer one proposition but there be a howling riot of argument (Miller 28). Proctor reminds Parris that his salary is sixty-six pounds, including six for firewood. When Parris expresses the need for new, gold candlesticks, Proctor once again openly disagrees and is adamant that he will not attend church in a place where he preach nothin but golden candlesticks until he had them (Miller 62). Parris fear of being put out like the cat, relieving him of his position in Salem, push him to demand the deed to his current residence (Miller 28). Never before in Salem had such a demand been made by a minister, only to be denied. Free firewood, gold candlesticks, and the deed to the house represent Parris greed for material items and his desire for power over anyone who challenges his authority. Creating chaos throughout the town, Thomas Putnam uses the witch trials to accuse others in order to buy their land and destroy their lives. Although Putnam is a wealthy, land-owning man, nothing seems to satisfy his wants and wishes. After inheriting an extravagant amount of land from his grandfather, Putnam continues to want more. He is not willing to share the land with those in need and becomes angry if anyone enters what he believes is his property. Putnam threatens Proctor that if [he] loads one oak of [his] and [hell] fight to drag it home (Miller 30). Putnam warns Proctor that if he attempts to take anything from his property, then he will have issues with Putnam. Because his brother-in-law is prevented from being voted into the office of ministers, Putnam holds a grudge against Francis Nurse. Along with gaining profit from the misfortune of his enemies, Putnam disciplines them. The only thing Putnam wants is to see people suffer; it makes him feel powerful. Hungry for reven ge and to display his power, Putnam encourages his daughter, Ruth, to accuse innocent people of committing witchcraft. Giles questions Putnam about why he would use his teenage daughter to cry witchery upon George Jacobs that is now in jail, but Putnam claims that it is a lie (Miller 89). Putnamrs plan is to accuse Jacobs of being a witch, so by law, he will be forced to forfeit his property. As Putnamrs neighbors are found guilty, his acreage expands. No strong personal relationship can be found that connects Reverend Samuel Parris and Thomas Putnam; however, similarities in their hunger for power is shown throughout the play. Besides family, Putnam is one of the first people to call upon the Parrisrs house after Betty falls ill. It seems as if Putnam is there to convince Parris that witchcraft is to blame for both Bettyrs and his daughter, Ruthrs, sudden illness. Putnam encourages Parris to speak with the townspeople, blaming witches for his daughterrs sickness. At first, it seems that Putnam wants Parris to denounce the devil and have the village bless him for it, but realistically it appears that Putnam is only looking out for himself. Putnam is angry with the people of Salem for not selecting his brother-in-law as the town minister, so he is going to use Parris position of authority to seek revenge on the people in the community he feels are his enemies. Using unyielding pressure, Putnam is able to convince Parris to commit to the idea of supernatural forces, or witchery, that is the root of Bettyrs sickness. Once admitted by Reverend Parris, the stage for what becomes Salemrs witch hunt is set and Putnamrs desire for revenge and profit fall into place. Some of the primary accusations come from Putnam and are supported by Parris. These two men, among others, use their influence and power to accuse innocent people of illegal acts of witchcraft, which result in nineteen deaths by the time the trials are over. With great power comes great responsibility (Voltaire); however, few are responsible enough to remain fair. Reverend Samuel Parris and Thomas Putnam use their power as a tool that causes a lot of harm to many people in the town of Salem. Miller reveals how having too much pride in oners self will end in your downfall or someones demise. The Crucible shows how these two men and their search for power did not gain the respect and social status they feel they deserve and ultimately ended up the same way they began the play. Throughout history, the hunger for power has the potential to make an impact on a personrs life be it positive or negative. During the Salem Witch Trials, many lives were taken from people because of oners pride overpowered all. No one will ever know how or if these deaths could have been prevented, but one can take the lessons learned through the characters, and use them in reality.